The Daily Twigg April 29, 2013
So much more could and should be done
to make B.C. the truly best place in the world
By John Twigg (Copyright)
It's a bit rich to suddenly see all the fooferaw around Premier Christy Clark's
foolish red-light incident in which leading pundits, the mainstream
media and even some of her own B.C. Liberal Party members are now
questioning her character.
Yes she was stupid to stop and then go through a red light at a deserted
intersection at 5 a.m. with her son on the way to his hockey practise
and even moreso with a Vancouver Sun reporter in the back seat preparing
a pre-election profile, and she was even more stupid when she mis-spoke
about what she claimed she and her son to have said about it before and
then gradually changed her story about her story...
Clark's character has long been questionable
We've heard Clark do that many times before about so many issues, from
misrepresenting her dubious role as a leaky cabinet minister in the
scandal-plagued sale of BCRail to her latest fabrications about the
state of B.C.'s finances and economy and what the bond-rating agencies
say about it, and what the New Democrats espouse and on and on.
Hey folks where have you been these last three years or so? The same
folks now questioning Clark's character sat more or less mute while she
pulled off numerous similar peccadilloes on her way to winning - some
say stealing - the leadership of the B.C. Liberal Party about two years
ago, including the notorious noxious use of bulk sales of new voting
membership in the Indo-Canadian communities and then apparently the bulk
voting by those memberships too, which numerous party insiders are
aware of but so far only the notorious "political blogger" Alex G.
Tsakumis has reported in any detail (especially the involvement of a
convicted thug).
Whether or not Christy Clark's leadership win was marginally legal or
not, it now appears that a cabal of powerful backroomers including
lobbyist Patrick Kinsella and senior government lawyer Doug Eastwood
among others inserted her into the Premier's Office so she could keep a
lid on that and numerous other potential scandals in the wake of former
premier Gordon Campbell's unexpected ouster in the wake of the Basi-Virk
and Harmonized Sales Tax fiascos. Campbell is now in de facto witness
protection serving as Canada's Agent General London while Kinsella
reportedly is retiring and moving to a gated community in Palm Springs
and Eastwood has been transferred to the B.C. Justice Institute training
academy.
Dix shies away from personal attacks
The list of issues Clark has mishandled is too long for this column and
sadly you won't find that list on the B.C. New Democratic Party's
website either due to an anomaly in this campaign, namely that NDP
leader Adrian Dix has decided to only offer positive alternatives,
though the NDP did recently (Apr. 28) publish a cutely-worded list of
why a dozen of the B.C. Liberal Party candidates could be called upon to
step aside (which came soon after pundit Rafe Mair had criticized Dix
for being too milquetoast [my word, his concept] against Clark).
NDP MLAs and officers have criticized numerous policy failings by Clark
and the Liberals, especially re misrepresenting the size of the deficits
and debt, but none have gone so far as to say she is personally flawed
even though Christy has run up the debt even more than Campbell did, she
has botched numerous projects such as the BC Place naming and the
Prince George wooden office tower, and she has alienated many of her
party's stalwarts, notably Kevin Falcon and George Abbott who lost the
leadership and already have new jobs outside government.
Christy also has continued the chronic underfunding of numerous critical
social services, she has allowed very few sittings of the legislature,
she has churned through staff like a revolving door for a shoe sale, she
has alienated other Premiers and scrambled to field a full slate of
candidates, and abused the election process with massive spending on
taxpayer-paid advertisements, and on and on like that.
But now the MSM pundits and a few diehard Liberals are now questioning
her character because she drove through an empty intersection at 5 a.m.?
and then misrepresented it?? It's ludicrous, but if that's what it
takes then so be it. It's obviously time overdue for her and her
colleagues to go for many many reasons, and perhaps this will be her
last straw. We'll see how it plays or if it is even raised in the
televised debate tonight at 6:30.
Dix faces new questions after policy flip-flop
However Clark is sheltered somewhat by a strange irony that is curiously
typical of B.C.'s often tumultuous topsy-turvy politics and that is
that B.C. NDP leader Adrian Dix also is being subjected to
renewed questions about his character (which probably is also partly why
he eschewed negative campaigning).
Dix of course became notorious for back-dating a memo to file in order
to try to protect his then boss Premier Glen Clark from a scandal (a
constituent seeking a gaming licence), then Dix getting caught and being
forced to resign. Dix managed to admit his mistake and go on to win the
B.C. NDP leadership also about two years ago and also won narrowly
after some questions arose about his supporters recruiting bulk votes
from the Indo-Canadian community, but he seemed well on his way to
recovery until he was found to be on SkyTrain without a ticket, which he
also managed to live down.
Though Liberal campaign strategists and external supporters launched
massive advertising campaigns focussed on Dix's peccadilloes, claiming
he thus was unfit to be a Premier, the polls showed repeatedly that
voters had forgiven him, with 45% supporting the NDP versus only about
31% for the Clark Liberals and the remainder going to B.C.'s Green and
Conservative parties (and about 20% undecided). As well, Dix topped Clark in the "best Premier" question.
So almost everyone was saying and assuming that it was Dix's election to win or lose and all he had to do was avoid mistakes.
As noted by pundit Norman Spector, the B.C. NDP campaign managed by
former federal leadership candidate Brian Topp was one of the most
astute he had ever seen by the B.C. NDP, and I agree with that as do
many others though I would have preferred a more balanced approach
including the positives but also lots of negatives about Clark and the
Liberals, lots of reasons why people should get out to vote against the
incumbents too.
But as perhaps many readers already know by now Dix may have blown it by
suddenly flip-flopping on an important policy question: whether Kinder
Morgan should be allowed to double the capacity of the former
Trans-Mountain Pipeline from Edmonton to Burnaby to enable new exports
of bitumen through Vancouver's inner harbour.
Initially Dix was studiously keeping an open mind on that proposal,
withholding comment until KM submitted its official proposal, but then
suddenly on Earth Day when he released the party's official platform he
came out against adding any new oil tanker shipments through Vancouver
harbour.
That reversal sparked a storm of controversy that is still raging and
probably will be a central issue in tonight's televised leaders debate
and unfortunately for Dix it renewed questions about his character from
pundits including Spector this morning on CKNW's Bill Good Show.
So why did Dix flip-flop? So far he hasn't given a solid explanation so
we are left to speculate that Topp's in-house polling had discovered a
tidal wave of support flowing to the Green Party and so to forestall it
he persuaded Dix to try to out-green the Greens, which he did at the
expense of Kinder Morgan, refinery workers and B.C. government revenues.
As a person who grew up in West Vancouver I well sympathize with people,
especially First Nations with rights to forage for food, who see
increased oil tanker traffic as a threat, and I share NDP energy critic
John Horgan's view that the terminus of Kinder Morgan's second line
could be moved to a place such as Sumas or even go directly to Anacortes
in Washington State, but either way the pipeline proposal is not for me
a make-or-break vote-determining issue because the environment has
co-existed reasonably well with Chevron's refinery in Burnaby for many
decades and could continue to do so even if it added one tanker ship per
day as now proposed. But it would be good to have a genuine review of
the options and their cost-benefits - as Dix originally was promising to
do. But now? Who knows. It has become a political football.
Campaign lacks creative ideas to grow jobs
What we have not seen yet from any party is creative ideas on how to
grow the economy and to create jobs (they're connected but not the same
thing), especially to add lots of low-skilled entry-level jobs which can
give marginalized people enough work experience to get and take
training to qualify for better jobs and to provide the skilled labour
that many major industries in B.C. are now clamoring for - in other
words moving towards full employment!
In my opinion the Number One Issue in the present B.C. election is the
economy in general (which is what the polls also say) and direct job
creation in particular, which the polls do not say and which the pols
(politicians) won't even mention maybe for fear of being accused of
being profligate wastrels.
In Dix's case we see a leader letting himself be steered by the party
factions that elected him leader and the party pros who want to make him
Premier, so his 74-page platform is super-cautious, with virtually no
new spending nor even any major new directions but lots of positive
small steps such as linking B.C. food to B.C. hospitals, and providing
good fodder for his one-a-day policy pronouncements.
A prime example is B.C. Ferries, which in Dix's platform will get $40
million and a two-year rate freeze while the new government studies its
options, which could be worse but also better.
For example, I have been pushing a radical idea to add a third-crossing
from the area near Vancouver International Airport and the Iona sewage
outfall over to Gabriola Island and then a short new bridge to the big
island. It would be a very short crossing that could easily cater to
truck traffic and foot passengers, especially with a link to SkyTrain in
Richmond, and here's the kicker: the new ferry could be fuelled by
gases extracted from Metro Vancouver's sewage which is soon going to
need new treatment plants costing billions of dollars anyway!
B.C. Conservative Party leader John Cummins meanwhile is
proposing an innovative tax credit for ferry users which was
well-received, and the B.C. Green Party probably has a ferries plank in
its massive on-line policy manual but if so they are not yet campaigning
on it. And the Clark Liberals? Who knows - don't ask don't tell?
Green Party leader Sterk raising profile
So what we see so far is Clark and the Liberals promising pie in the sky
to eliminate debt in decades hence when or really if the liquefied
natural gas concept comes to fruition while Cummins and the
Conservatives pander to small-c curmudgeons and the Greens offer such a
plethora of ideas that so far no one thing stands out.
B.C. Green Party leader Jane Sterk won the radio debate on Friday
(according to me and Vaughn Palmer and others) because she raised her
profile and credibility, especially when she quickly connected with a
caller complaining about the pittance disabled people must live on, but
it remains to be seen if the Greens can win more than a few seats.
One problem the Greens have is that too many of their activists are
well-meaning zealots who lack common sense about economics, business and
government finances, and who accept on blind faith the scare tactics
and twisted statistics from groups such as the International Panel on
Climate Change who have vested policy interests as conflicted as any
business or industry (viz Al Gore).
Thus when they see the level of carbon in the atmosphere approaching 400
parts per million they willingly claim it is some kind of tipping point
towards disaster when really it's only one more artificial dot on a
long continuum of what is really a relatively tiny component - in other
words a bit of nonsense akin to the Y2K panic.
Yes the Green zealots are well-meaning, and yes rising sea level is a
problem that some people will need to address (such as by Richmond
adding berms akin to Holland), but the causes of the warming (which many
claim has already ended) are mainly natural (changes in solar phases)
and meanwhile there are many many other issues that are far more urgent
and far more important, such as job creation, health funding and skills
training, to name three.
Many moves available to improve B.C.
What we are not seeing in this campaign are major new reforms to the
structures of our province in ways that will benefit the people living
here now and furthermore become a model that other nation-states would
do well to emulate.
In particular, B.C. should move quickly to revive the Bank of B.C. and enable it to issue a made-in-B.C. currency
which would be instrumental in preserving the province's stability and
the people's security if or when the U.S. Federal Reserve and/or other
central banks fail or collapse under their mountains of debt. No doubt
some readers will immediately become naysayers believing it couldn't
possibly work, that it would cause inflation or some other such flaw,
but really it's simple: in order for B.C. to survive the tribulations
ahead it would help a lot to have recourse to its own money supply
operating in parallel with other currencies as now with the U.S. and
Canadian dollars. And to keep the B.C. dollar viable the Province would
declare it acceptable for the payment of taxes.
The Province also could mandate or legislate or directly create a wide variety of new industries, especially by legalizing marijuana but also encouraging industrial hemp,
which is a sort of miracle plant providing food, fibres, energy, oils
and medicines all from one renewable and easy-to-grow plant.
It also could enable bulk exports of surplus water, which the
province has in abundance and could do through a single-window export
agency like Saskatchewan does with potash fertilizer or an auction
approach to get around NAFTA, or in other ways even including the NAWAPA
proposal which would see the high-altitude Site C dam collecting rain
and snow melt and delivering it through canals and lift stations all the
way to Arizona. Though many well-meaning people have painted water
exports as a devilish trap, in fact it would be a renewable bonanza for
B.C. and a boon to people and farmers in many locations including
California farms that now send very large volumes of water-laden
vegetables into Canada.
Similarly the Province could do better jobs exporting energy, forest and mineral products, it could move towards self-sufficiency in food and other essential products including micro-hydro and other forms of renewable energy, and it could improve its delivery of home care, reform courts and jails, add coastal ferries - it could electrify railways, repurpose ICBC, save the Agricultural Land Reserve and do almost everything in the platforms of all four major parties.
It also could build more rental housing, encourage energy retrofits (good sources of new jobs too), enable more woodlots and tree farms and catch up on reforestation.
It could expand preventive health care to reduce hospital and drug costs, it could invest in social programs and service-providers to reduce crime and limit court and police costs.
There also could be lots of financial reforms, such as finding a
better funding formula for municipalities and reopening negotiations
with Ottawa to this next time do a better job of designing, selling and
then implementing a better harmonized sales tax system (the previous HST had an illegitimate process and too many design flaws). We might also bring back the B.C. Savings Bonds that were killed by Gordon Campbell.
And finally (at least for this list) it could engage in some systemic political, electoral and legislative reforms
including more electronic direct democracy (assuming it survives a
proper public process beforehand) and removing the system of partisan
bullying exposed by journalist Sean Holman in his new film documentary
called Whipped.
Indeed all that is still only a short survey of the many good things
that could and should be done to make British Columbia into truly the
best place in the world and a beacon of light to other nation-states.
We can begin by watching tonight's leaders' debate and then voting accordingly on May 14 (or sooner by advance ballot).
No comments:
Post a Comment